The 2016 US presidential candidates, including Hilary Clinton, are competing against one another by using strong language against China and Russia in order to receive campaign funding from wealthy neoconservative groups, a political analyst from Virginia says.
“The way that American politics works is that the candidate with the most money almost always wins, at least at the national level,” said Keith Preston, chief editor and director of AttacktheSystem.com, a website dedicated to encouraging revolt against domestic and foreign US government policies.
“The candidate that has the most money wins about 90 percent of the time,” Preston told Press TV on Sunday.
“What Ms. Clinton is trying to do is stake out a position for herself as far as picking a hard-line stance against Russia and against China for the sake of gaining the financial backing of all of the neoconservative billionaire plutocrats,” he said.
“We’ve got a lot of Republicans, about 15 or 20 candidates that are all trying to outdo each other in terms of how hawkish they can be on foreign policy and how tough they say they’re going to be on Iran or on Russia or whomever and Ms. Clinton is trying to get on that game as well,” he added.
Preston made the comments after Democratic presidential candidate Clinton criticized both China and Russia for threatening its neighbors and undermining American interests.....Strategic Culture Foundation
Clinton, other candidates competing on hard-line stance against China, Russia: Analyst
Wayne Madsen
2 comments:
Whereas Trump said he would "make friends" with Putin/Russia. He is also for keeping and expanding Social Security. Good positions, both.
Bush gave him the nick-name "Pootie-Poot"...
BUT... that was probably before he reneged on the nat gas deal when the price shot up to $13...
Same with Venezuela, Bush admin reversed the early coup against Chavez but that was BEFORE Chavez reneged on the oil deals when he saw oil price at $145...
TPTB wont stand for reneging.... and the ROW's totalitarian's (Putin/Chavez,etc...) indignation that then leads to or foments the renege is triggered by high prices stated in the currencies of TPTB ie EUR and USD terms... in REAL terms the deals never change from the original deal...
The ROW has to put off the totalitarianism (for 1) AND (2) STOP letting short term bullish price shocks in USD and EUR terms make them go past simple indignation to the point of reneging... they need to become satisfied with operating their own currency systems and stop becoming the piece of shit, human garbage USD-EUR zombies that they always become...
Post a Comment